We investigate how mental-health signals are expressed and co-constructed in online discourse during corporate layoffs. Using the lens of stress-appraisal theory, we examine the linguistic expression of stress and coping dynamics in r/Layoffs posts. We find that commenters may mirror or amplify the emotional framing of original posts (OPs). For instance, threat-framed posts evoke threat-oriented responses. We employ logit and probit regression models to predict comment-level characteristics and find that the tone and content of the OPs provide an initial framing signal, but comment-level characteristics are driven primarily by local psychological dynamics. Our mediation analysis suggests that the association between OP-level and comment-level characteristics operates primarily through indirect rather than direct pathways.

Large-scale corporate layoffs create unprecedented levels of uncertainty, fear, and emotional stress among employees. Millions of people share their stories of job loss and seek advice on social media platforms. Reddit, in particular, has emerged as a major platform for deliberations on layoffs, and r/Layoffs serves as a real-time collective diary of distress, anxiety, and resilience. Recent works on stress detection and mental-health classification [11, 16] have investigated how individuals express and process psychological distress, particularly during job searches [10, 22] or unemployment [6, 7, 14, 20]. However, a crucial omission in the literature is how people react during mass layoffs.

We operationalize ‘mass layoffs’ through concentrated discussion activity within r/Layoffs during a high-volume posting period, rather than external labor-market benchmarks. We extracted our data from the r/Layoffs subreddit with contextual metadata, including flair categories such as recently laid off, job hunting, unemployment, and previously laid off, as well as hierarchical conversation threads and user interactions. Prior studies have primarily focused on broad affective categories or generic sentiment labels, often overlooking the situational and interactional nature of stress responses during crises. In contrast, drawing insights from stress-appraisal theory [13], we explicitly examine both what people express at the moment of job loss and how these expressions shape subsequent community responses within discussion threads. Using the transactional model of stress, we analyse the interrelationships between primary appraisals, secondary appraisals, and coping strategies as they unfold through post-comment interactions. Specifically, we focus on, RQ1: how post-level appraisal framing relates to comment-level responses, RQ2: how coping strategies propagate in discussion threads, and RQ3: how these relationships vary across psychological dimensions.

Table 1: Sample (and partially Paraphrased for anonymity) Reddit expressions in accordance with Stress Appraisal Theory

On the methodology front, beyond exploratory analyses, we employ logit and probit regression models to predict comment-level appraisals, coping strategies, and mental-health expressions from post-level framing, community context, and local psychological signals. Next, we conduct mediation analyses to compare direct post effects with indirect pathways operating through intermediate appraisals or mental health signals, thereby clarifying whether emotional outcomes arise from direct emotional transmission or socially mediated sensemaking processes [1]. Contrary to prior studies that rely on coarse sentiment or broad mental-health categories, we elucidate how stress and coping are socially co-constructed within domain-specific online communities, extending stress-appraisal theory from individual cognition to collective discourse.

Drawing on Stress Appraisal Theory, we examine three intricately interlinked psychological dimensions: (1) primary and secondary appraisals, (2) coping styles, and (3) mental-health indicators.

Primary and Secondary Appraisals: Stress arises not only from the stressor itself but also from an individual's appraisal of the situation [13]. Primary appraisal evaluates a situation as a threat, harm or loss, challenge, or benign, whereas secondary appraisal assesses available resources and perceived control [12, 13, 18]. Accordingly, we identify linguistic expressions, such as danger, opportunity, helplessness, blame, etc., and classify them into primary appraisal labels (threat, harm or loss, challenge, or benign) and secondary appraisal labels (low or high perceived control, problem-solving confidence, uncertainty, blame patterns, and resource adequacy). Together, these appraisals shape psychological reactions and behavioural adaptations following job loss [18]. Notably, job insecurity can generate distress exceeding even the effects of specific childhood traumas [18].

Coping Styles: Coping refers to the cognitive and behavioural strategies used to manage stress, including problem-solving, emotion-focused, avoidance, and seeking support [4, 12, 23]. Based on linguistic cues such as planning and action verbs, emotional expression, withdrawal language, and requests for help or advice, we classify coping as problem-focused, emotion-focused, meaning-focused, avoidant, or support-seeking. We aim to investigate whether appraisal patterns influence coping choices, such as whether high perceived control encourages problem-focused coping.

Mental-Health Dimensions: Drawing insights from digital mental-health research, we identify seven dimensions from semantic and contextual cues: anxiety, depression, stress or burnout, anger, resilience, social support, and emotional numbing or avoidance [3, 9, 15]. These dimensions capture both distress and adaptive functioning in layoff-related discussions.

Reddit is a rich source for identifying mental health signals during periods of stress, including job loss and employment uncertainty [2, 11, 17, 24]. Thus, we extract our dataset from the r/Layoffs subreddit between August 2025 and November 2025. We deliberately focused on a short time span during which the layoff crisis was at its peak, avoiding a longer period to prevent data contamination from other stress factors. We do not claim this period represents an objective peak in macroeconomic layoffs, but rather a phase of heightened community activity within the subreddit. After preprocessing, the final corpus consists of 987 Reddit posts and 10,233 corresponding user comments. This subreddit provides a unique setting for studying stress and coping, as users share their personal experiences, emotional reactions, and workplace concerns in real-time, anonymously. Each post contains structured metadata (e.g., flair, score, and timestamp) and a narrative that reflects individual interpretations of job insecurity. Comments add conversational context, often deliberating on coping strategies and available community support. This multi-layered dataset offers rich insights into how people collectively appraise and respond to job loss.

Flairs: Psychological expression on Reddit is shaped by the surrounding social context [8]. On the r/Layoffs subreddit, Reddit flairs allow users to self-categorize their situation (e.g., “recently laid off,” “job hunting,” “previously laid off”). These contextual markers shape the tone, content, and emotional intensity of posts and therefore function as important features in our labeling framework.

LLM-based Annotation: Using transformer-based embeddings and a few-shot–guided LLM classifier, each post and comment receives multi-label assignments capturing primary and secondary stress appraisals, coping strategies, and mental-health signals. To ground the model in the transactional stress–coping framework, we provided a curated set of expert-annotated exemplars illustrating conceptual mappings between linguistic cues and theoretical categories—for example, a challenge-framed post (“Just got laid off, but honestly, this might push me to finally build something of my own”) versus a threat-oriented post (“My severance is unclear, and HR won't respond. This is unbelievably stressful.”).

All instances were classified using the gpt-4o-mini model with deterministic decoding (temperature = 0), ensuring reproducibility and consistent label assignment [19, 21]. To evaluate annotation quality, we conducted a systematic human validation study on a stratified small subset of the corpus. Human annotations were produced using the same labeling guidelines as those embedded in the LLM prompts. Reliability was consistently high across appraisal and coping dimensions, but, as expected, this was not the case between adjacent constructs (e.g., threat vs. harm/loss). Due to space constraints, we do not include detailed prompt templates or reliability analyses. Overall, we find that the LLM classifier achieves expert-level consistency while enabling scalable, theory-driven annotation across thousands of posts and comments.

This section describes the patterns of association among appraisals, coping styles, and mental-health signals in layoff-related discourse. Unless otherwise stated, reported values reflect proportions and conditional distributions rather than correlation coefficients.

Primary and Secondary Appraisals Across Flairs: Figure 2 elucidates that posts depicting direct layoff experiences, especially recently laid off, show concentrated patterns of high threat and harm/loss, indicating strong emotional involvement. Conversely, flairs related to meme or resources contain minimal emotional aspects, unlike experiential flairs. Therefore, the social context signalled by flairs may shape both the emotional and cognitive framing of the discourse. Similarly, Figure 3 indicates that Recently-laid-off posts exhibit higher levels of lowcontrol and blameother, indicating unpredictability and external causation. In contrast, question posts are associated with seekinginformation. These patterns are consistent with Stress Appraisal Theory, i.e., situational framing (via flair) shapes how users evaluate their coping resources and, subsequently, their coping behaviours.

Primary Appraisal Propagation from Post to Comment: Figure 4 reports the relationship between primary appraisals expressed in OPs and the appraisal patterns of subsequent comments. OPs classified as threat or harm/loss generally evoke similar threat-oriented responses, indicating that commenters often echo the poster's perception of situational danger. Interestingly, a significant portion of the replies is threat-oriented, indicating that community discourse often accentuates risk, regardless of the initial framing.

Primary Appraisal in Posts to Secondary Appraisal in Comments: Interestingly, Figure 5 reveals that challenge-framed posts mostly generate high-control responses from commenters, with 40% of replies reflecting confidence or a perceived ability to act. In contrast, harm/loss- and threat-framed posts exhibit more distributed secondary appraisal patterns. Uncertainty-framed posts also attract relatively high proportions of uncertainty in replies (27%). Overall, this indicates that commenters adjust their appraisal style in ways that both reflect and subtly reshape the emotional framing of the OP.

Coping Strategies and Mental Health: Consistent with the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, in Figure 6, we observe a clear pattern of coping convergence and emotional diffusion. For instance, emotion-focused posts generate predominantly emotion-focused comments, with strong mental-health signals of anger, anxiety, resilience, and sadness, indicating that these comments prioritize emotional responses over instrumental advice. Similarly, in accordance with adaptive coping matching, problem-focused posts attract problem-focused responses and also display resilience and anxiety in comments. Interestingly, irrespective of the coping strategies in the OP, most comments are overwhelmingly emotion-focused and display resilience, indicating the community's role in reinforcing shared sense-making and providing reassurance.

We employ logit and probit regression models, standard tools for discrete choice and limited-dependent-variable analysis in the social sciences [5]. Estimating both specifications enables us to assess the robustness of coefficient signs. We find results are consistent across models, and this consistency across models reflects robustness in directional associations.

Primary Appraisal Dynamics of Layoff Discourse: To examine the mechanisms underlying appraisal formation in comments, we estimated a set of binary response models predicting whether a comment expresses a harm/loss, threat, challenge, or benign primary appraisal. For each outcome, we fit both logistic and probit regression models and considered the same set of explanatory variables, i.e., post-level appraisals, coping styles, mental-health indicators, subreddit flairs, and standardized post scores, as well as comment-level secondary appraisals, coping strategies, and mental-health signals.

Figure 7 reports coefficients for statistically significant predictors of threat. Both models exhibit mostly consistent coefficient signs and magnitudes, indicating the robustness of our findings. We find that threat appraisals are primarily associated with comment-level anger, sadness (negatively), and anxiety. Responses are also associated with emotion- and problem-focused responses and high uncertainty. For brevity, we have not reported the findings for other primary appraisals, but we do find variations across them. For instance, high control is positively associated with challenge posts but negatively associated with harm/loss posts. Overall, we find that while OP-level appraisals provide an initial framing signal, the linguistic expression in comments is driven primarily by local psychological dynamics, consistent with transactional stress theory.

Secondary Appraisal Dynamics of Layoff Discourse: Similar to our previous analysis, we also tried to predict secondary appraisals in comments, i.e., high control, low control, uncertainty, and blaming others, from post-level context and comment-level psychological signals. Figure 8 reports logit–probit regression coefficients for uncertainty. We find that uncertainty posts are positively associated with comment-level anxiety but negatively associated with comment-level anger, resilience, and sadness. We also find a negative relationship with comment-level support-seeking or problem-focused coping styles. Similarly, we note that high perceived control is strongly associated with comment-level resilience and negatively associated with anxiety, sadness, and support-seeking or emotion-focused coping, indicating an efficacy-oriented response pattern. Conversely, low perceived control is positively associated with emotion-focused and support-seeking coping strategies, reflecting helplessness-oriented stress processing. We have not reported the probit/logit findings for all secondary appraisals, but for all of them, comment-level aspects dominate prediction, while post-level signals play a weaker anchoring role.

Coping Dynamics of Layoff Discourse: We find that across all four coping outcomes, comment-level emotional and cognitive states are the primary determinants, while post-level variables exert weaker but interpretable effects. For instance, problem-focused coping is positively associated with comment-level resilience and high perceived control and negatively associated with anger, sadness, anxiety, and uncertainty, indicating an action-oriented response pattern under conditions of perceived efficacy. Conversely, emotion-focused coping shows strong positive associations with anger, sadness, anxiety, and uncertainty and a pronounced negative association with high perceived control.

Similarly, seeking social support is strongly predicted by comment-level distress signals, particularly anger, anxiety, uncertainty, and low control. This suggests that support-seeking emerges as a socially mediated response to heightened stress. Collectively, these results reinforce a transactional view of coping in which responses are shaped primarily by local psychological dynamics within comments, while post-level framing serves as a secondary contextual cue.

Mental-Health Dynamics of Layoff Discourse: Finally, we consider mental-health dynamics. As an illustrative example, Figure 9 reports the logit and probit estimates for Sadness. We find a positive association between sadness in the OP and comment-level characteristics such as uncertainty, low control, and support-seeking. Conversely, we find a negative association between sadness and problem-focused coping dynamics. Similarly, perceived uncertainty is a positive predictor of anxiety and sadness, while high control exhibits a positive relationship with resilience. These patterns are intuitive, but once again, we note that comment-level aspects, rather than the characteristics of the OP, dominate the prediction of mental-health dynamics.

Table 2: Mediation analysis results for the top 10 pathways (from original post → comment), ranked by absolute indirect effect. Prefixes p and c denote post-level and comment-level psychological dimensions, respectively. Therefore, each row reports a mediation chain from post-level psychological framing (X) to a downstream comment outcome (Y) through an intermediate comment state (M). ACME denotes the Average Causal Mediation Effect (indirect effect) with 95% confidence intervals. ADE denotes the Average Direct Effect of X on Y not operating through M. Total is the sum of indirect and direct effects. % Med. indicates the proportion of the total effect explained by mediation. Significance levels are indicated as follows: p < 0.001.

Mediation Analysis of Psychological Pathways: Table 2 presents the ten pathways with the largest indirect effects. Challenge-framed and problem-focused posts are often associated with lower anger, external blame, threat, and emotion-focused coping in comments, primarily through intermediate comment-level appraisals and mental-health signals. In these pathways, the indirect effect (ACME) is substantially larger than the direct effect (ADE), accounting for approximately 76–91% of the total association. This suggests that post-level framing is related to downstream responses mainly through comment-level sensemaking rather than through direct emotional transmission [1]. Row 4 exhibits inconsistent mediation, as the positive indirect association through resilience is partially offset by a small negative direct association with high control. Therefore, the proportion mediated cannot be substantively interpreted for this pathway. Given the cross-sectional design and lack of temporal ordering, these findings represent statistical decompositions of structured associations between OPs and comments rather than causal relationships between them.

Limitations: This study has several limitations that open up avenues for future research. First, the cross-sectional and observational design prevents us from making causal inferences, particularly in mediation-style analyses without temporal ordering. Second, comments are nested within posts and users, and independence assumptions may be compromised. Third, annotation primarily relies on LLM-assisted labeling with partial human validation, which may introduce construct ambiguity. Finally, the focus on a single subreddit and the short time window limit generalizability beyond this context. Future research could extend this approach to cross-platform settings and longitudinal user trajectories.

Our study advances computational social science research by providing a theory-grounded, large-scale analysis of intricate psychological dynamics in layoff-related discourse on Reddit. A core contribution of our study is the empirical evidence suggesting that comment-level psychological states, rather than post-level framing, are the strongest predictors of downstream appraisal outcomes. The strong agreement between the logit and probit models ensures the robustness of our findings. Notably, mediation analyses suggest that the associations between OP-level appraisals and downstream comment-level appraisals or coping styles are largely indirect.

Theoretically, these findings enrich transactional stress theory in the context of online platforms by showing that appraisal signals embedded in OPs can potentially function as collective cognitive cues that shape interpretation, attribution, and emotional regulation at scale. However, linguistic expression in comments is primarily a function of local psychological dynamics. Our results suggest that communities such as r/Layoffs operate as ecosystems of social coping, where deliberative sensemaking and secondary appraisal play crucial roles in overcoming collective distress during periods of economic disruption. Overall, this study contributes to the growing literature on AI for social good by demonstrating how computational models can elucidate latent psychosocial mechanisms in large-scale social media data, and in turn inform systems that foster resilience, empathy, and constructive discourse in vulnerable communities.

Ethical Considerations: Reddit posts and comments were collected through its public API and analysed anonymously. We report only aggregate patterns and paraphrased posts to protect user privacy.

GenAI Usage Disclosure: LLMs were used in the research process to improve code for executing experiments, clarify language, correct grammatical errors, and generate figure layouts. The models used include ChatGPT and Claude Code, with different versions applied at different stages. LLMs were also used for the classification task itself, as described in Section 3.

This work was partially supported by the Wallenberg AI, Autonomous Systems and Software Program (WASP) funded by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

ACM full-text HTML

ACM Digital Library

Imported from ACM’s structured HTML source. ACM Reference Format: Aparup Khatua. 2026. How Communities Process Layoffs: Appraisal, Coping, and Emotional Mediation on Reddit. In 37th ACM Conference on Hypertext (HT '26), September 14--18, 2026, London, United Kingdom. ACM, New York, NY, USA 7 Pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3800935.3830872

[1] Reuben M Baron and David A Kenny. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology 51, 6 (1986), 1173.

[2] Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 8. 71–80.

[3] Radhika Garg, Yash Kapadia, and Subhasree Sengupta. 2021. Using the lenses of emotion and support to understand unemployment discourse on reddit. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–24.

[4] Christian T Gloria and Mary A Steinhardt. 2016. Relationships among positive emotions, coping, resilience and mental health. Stress and health 32, 2 (2016), 145–156.

[5] William H. Greene. 2018. Econometric Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.

[6] Leon Grunberg, Sarah Y Moore, and Edward Greenberg. 2001. Differences in psychological and physical health among layoff survivors: the effect of layoff contact.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 6, 1 (2001), 15.

[7] Kyu-Man Han, Sang Min Lee, Minha Hong, Seok-Joo Kim, Sunju Sohn, Yun-Kyeung Choi, Jinhee Hyun, Heeguk Kim, Jong-Sun Lee, So Hee Lee, et al. 2023. COVID-19 pandemic-related job loss impacts on mental health in South Korea. Psychiatry Investigation 20, 8 (2023), 730.

[8] Benjamin D Horne, Sibel Adali, and Sujoy Sikdar. 2017. Identifying the social signals that drive online discussions: A case study of reddit communities. In 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN). IEEE, 1–9.

[9] Chengyue Huang, Anindita Bandyopadhyay, Weiguo Fan, Aaron Miller, and Stephanie Gilbertson-White. 2023. Mental toll on working women during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study using Reddit data. PloS one 18, 1 (2023), e0280049.

[10] Molly Ireland, Micah Iserman, and Kiki Adams. 2023. Sadness and anxiety language in Reddit messages before and after quitting a job. In Proceedings of the 13th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment, & social media analysis. 467–478.

[11] Zheng Ping Jiang, Sarah Ita Levitan, Jonathan Zomick, and Julia Hirschberg. 2020. Detection of mental health from reddit via deep contextualized representations. In Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on health text mining and information analysis. 147–156.

[12] Tiffany D Kriz, Phillip M Jolly, and Mindy K Shoss. 2021. Coping with organizational layoffs: Managers’ increased active listening reduces job insecurity via perceived situational control.Journal of occupational health psychology 26, 5 (2021), 448.

[13] Richard S Lazarus and Susan Folkman. 1987. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of personality 1, 3 (1987), 141–169.

[14] Sarah C Olesen, Peter Butterworth, Liana S Leach, Margaret Kelaher, and Jane Pirkis. 2013. Mental health affects future employment as job loss affects mental health: findings from a longitudinal population study. BMC psychiatry 13, 1 (2013), 144.

[15] Dorrit Posel, Adeola Oyenubi, and Umakrishnan Kollamparambil. 2021. Job loss and mental health during the COVID-19 lockdown: Evidence from South Africa. PloS one 16, 3 (2021), e0249352.

[16] Moein Razavi, Samira Ziyadidegan, Ahmadreza Mahmoudzadeh, Saber Kazeminasab, Elaheh Baharlouei, Vahid Janfaza, Reza Jahromi, and Farzan Sasangohar. 2024. Machine learning, deep learning, and data preprocessing techniques for detecting, predicting, and monitoring stress and stress-related mental disorders: scoping review. JMIR Mental Health 11, 1 (2024), e53714.

[17] Nazanin Sabri, Anh C Pham, Ishita Kakkar, and Mai ElSherief. 2024. Inferring mental burnout discourse across Reddit communities. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact. 224–231.

[18] Nina Sirola. 2024. Job insecurity and well-being: Integrating life history and transactional stress theories. Academy of Management Journal 67, 3 (2024), 679–703.

[19] Zhen Tan, Dawei Li, Song Wang, Alimohammad Beigi, Bohan Jiang, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Mansooreh Karami, Jundong Li, Lu Cheng, and Huan Liu. 2024. Large language models for data annotation and synthesis: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 930–957.

[20] Ana Virgolino, Joana Costa, Osvaldo Santos, Maria Emília Pereira, Rita Antunes, Sara Ambrósio, Maria João Heitor, and António Vaz Carneiro. 2022. Lost in transition: a systematic review of the association between unemployment and mental health. Journal of Mental Health 31, 3 (2022), 432–444.

[21] Xinru Wang, Hannah Kim, Sajjadur Rahman, Kushan Mitra, and Zhengjie Miao. 2024. Human-llm collaborative annotation through effective verification of llm labels. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–21.

[22] Jiayu Yuki Yin, Novia Wong, and Madhu Reddy. 2025. Understanding User Experience of Support-Seeking on Reddit During Stressful Times. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9, 7 (2025), 1–25.

[23] Yun Zhang, Huiying Zhang, Jun Xie, and Xichun Yang. 2023. Coping with supervisor bottom-line mentality: the mediating role of job insecurity and the moderating role of supervisory power. Current Psychology 42, 13 (2023), 10556–10565.

[24] Ayah Zirikly, Philip Resnik, Ozlem Uzuner, and Kristy Hollingshead. 2019. CLPsych 2019 shared task: Predicting the degree of suicide risk in Reddit posts. In Proceedings of the sixth workshop on computational linguistics and clinical psychology. 24–33.